I want an Instapaper for video on my TV

Services like Instapaper and Read it Later are fantastic for letting you quickly save webpages that you want to read for later. There are iPhone and iPad apps, they work on the Kindle, they’re perfect for separating finding content from reading content.

I want the same thing for video. When I’m reading through my RSS, browsing the web, or get an email with some awesome video content, I’d love to be able to push that link to a Watch it Later service. Later on when I’m tucked in bed, I can pull the queue up on my iPad, or I can sink into my couch with my favorite beer and watch the queue on my TV.

After a bit of Google, I found a post by Fred Wilson describing this exact same problem – anyone have any luck with these services? BoxeeQueue, or L8R, or Vodpod?

Update: This functionality not only exists, it’s built directly into boxee! http://www.boxee.tv/bookmarklet/info. I’m doubly happy I just bought a Boxee Box today!

Mobile Web is Years Away from Competing with Native

Native mobile apps rule the mobile experience, no one in their right mind would deny that, but I’ve heard a lot of talk over the past year about the impending doom of native apps and how the mobile web is bound to replace them.

DeWitt Clinton:

we’ve been down this road before.

Who among us doesn’t remember the great debates in the late 90’s about how web sites wouldnever replace native applications on the desktop? That was just a decade ago, but now it seems laughable that people didn’t see clearly the upcoming dominance of webapps over native apps on the desktop.

Exhibit A: Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Amazon, Ebay, Gmail, MySpace, Craigslist, Wikipedia, Blogger, WordPress, etc., etc., etc.

The biggest successes of the past decade are all websites, not native apps.

His continues:

The mobile web browsers and mobile web toolkits of today just haven’t quite caught up yet with the native environments. But things are changing quickly.

I absolutely agree with DeWitt that mobile web apps will play a much larger role in the future, and generally crappy browsers are a big reason that web apps aren’t a larger part of the mobile landscape, but I completely disagree that the web vs native discussion we’re seeing today is a mirror of the web vs desktop of the 90s. Even with better browser technology, there is still plenty of room for native apps. I’ll argue that (1) mobile web vs native is not a direct parallel to the web vs desktop of the 90s, (2) even if we had amazing browsers, web standards lag too far behind native and (3) there is currently very little money in building a mobile web app.

Today’s Mobile is not the 90’s Desktop

As his evidence, DeWitt cites:

Exhibit A: Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Amazon, Ebay, Gmail, MySpace, Craigslist, Wikipedia, Blogger, WordPress, etc., etc., etc.

It’s true, these apps never would have made it on the desktop – but what happened in the 90s was only half about where the app was built – the second half was about where the data lived.

All of the data for these apps – every single one – puts the data in the cloud. This was a huge change from the 90s mentality of I-always-have-my-stuff-in-this-file-on-my-desktop-right-here. What made these web apps so successful was the change from data living siloed on the users desktop to finally living in the cloud. Having 100% of the data living in the cloud + the rapid iteration that these web clients could go through provided an overall better user experience. Web apps were revolutionary not only because they were web apps, but because the data lived in the web as well.

The 90s brought applications from the desktop to the web, and a the same time they brought data from the desktop to the web.

Continuing the evolution, the last decade has seen an explosion of REST APIs and OAuth, providing easy access to a web app’s data. The foundation of the Web 2.0 explosion was based on exactly this – Brad Feld even argues, “Today there is no excuse if you launch a consumer web service without an API.”

These APIs provide a huge difference between today’s mobile and the 90’s desktop. Moving data from the desktop to the web in the 90s, and the explosion of web services in the last decade have allowed native mobile apps to explode in growth. A developer with a free weekend can build an app based on any number of open web services, launch the app in the App Store, and charge $.99. This is with zero web service cost – the app is using 100% somebody else’s data + somebody else’s web services – yet he or she can still turn an easy profit.

Building a mobile web app may be equally easy from a development point of view, and it may even provide a similar user experience, and it may even be runnable on many more devices than the iPhone – but the developer has to pay to run the web site + maintenance + protect against security and hack attempts – done even modestly correctly this can be relatively expensive from a money and time perspective. What’s worse: there’s no easy way to actually charge for the web app to recoup costs. Higher cost to maintain and a harder sell to the customer – better mobile web browsers and faster development won’t solve this inherent problem with the mobile web.

Native Trumps Web Development

Exhibit B: The Twitter iPhone/iPad app. The twitter app supports seven image services, five video services, six URL shortening services, two read it later services, plus six additional twitter blocker / ego / stat services.

the twitter app uses over twenty different web services in its app – browser security prevents a developer from using even one different-domain web service. Since native apps aren’t bound by the cross-domain security issues in the browser – these apps can pull data from multiple different services in an easy to use unified interface.

HTML5 is the first major browser step forward in the past 10 years – and it bring developers only a fraction of the way toward offering native-like capability.¬†Native apps are able to take advantage of multiple threads, whereas JavaScript is bound to just 1 thread. Native apps can provide better caching, better offline support, faster load times and performance, and hardware accelerated animations, access to the compass, accelerometer, altitude, camera, file system, and more. Hardware matters –¬†HTML5 and related tech bring the web a much needed boost, but even the new hotness in web tech provides a lackluster experience compared to native.

Show Me the Money

As I mentioned earlier, it’s easier for a developer to make money with a native app than with a web app, and this won’t change anytime soon. The iTunes App Store provides a safe, consistent, and easy way to purchase apps directly from the mobile phone. There is no corrolary for the mobile web – the purchase experience is a clunky and inconsistent at best. Stand alone mobile web apps will never take off until there’s an easy and trusted way for customers to buy these apps directly from their phone.

Conclusion

Native mobile apps are fighting a different war than the desktop apps of the 90s. Open data, REST services, and OAuth allow for much richer native mobile apps than was possible on the desktop many years ago. Native apps can be developed to take advantage of these same web services with dramatically less cost than developing a web app.

What’s more, these native apps can be sold to end users much easier than selling mobile web apps.¬†While frameworks like jQuery Mobile and Sencha Touch are helping to make mobile web development easier,¬†it’s as difficult as ever to get users to pay for mobile web apps – and until this problem is solved, native will continue to dominate the mobile marketplace.

Google Author link
Page 18 of 51« First...10...1617181920...304050...Last »